Hearing that revision rhinoplasty may need rib cartilage can change the consultation. You are now considering the nose and a possible second surgical site. Before discussing travel or a date, understand why additional cartilage is being proposed, which alternatives exist and how both areas would be followed afterwards.
Sercan Göde coauthored a 2026 paper on closed revision rhinoplasty using rib cartilage. It offers a specific research context for these questions. This independent article does not recommend him, audit his outcomes or describe an operation selected for you. His professional profile is the separate starting point for background information.
Access and graft source answer different questions
“Closed” describes the surgical access. “Rib cartilage” describes a possible graft source. One does not automatically settle the other. A closed approach does not mean there can be no incision elsewhere when cartilage is harvested, and choosing a graft source does not by itself explain the whole operation.
Ask the surgeon to describe these decisions separately. What needs to be corrected? Why is a graft needed? Why this source? Why this access for your previous surgery and current anatomy? A technique label is easier to remember than those explanations, but less useful when deciding whether you understand the plan.
What the published cohort does and does not show
Closed Approach Rib Revision Rhinoplasty, by Göde and Berber, reports a retrospective cohort of 700 revision procedures performed between 2022 and 2024 in selected cases requiring rib cartilage, with at least 6 months of follow-up. It concerns a defined series, not every person seeking revision.
The study does not provide a randomised comparison with an open approach. It cannot establish that the closed approach is suitable for every revision or predict an individual result. The study population and follow-up period matter when interpreting its observations. Published cohort findings should not be presented as a guaranteed current personal success rate.
You can ask which parts of the publication are relevant to your anatomy and which are not. A reasonable discussion may also explain why a different approach or no operation is more appropriate. Reading a paper does not replace examining the nose or reviewing earlier surgery.
Bring the history that a photograph cannot supply
Gather earlier operative notes if available, dates of previous operations, information about grafts and any relevant postoperative treatment. Describe your breathing concerns separately from contour concerns. If a record is missing, say so; do not fill gaps with assumptions about what another surgeon did.
Ask what can be assessed remotely and what remains uncertain until examination. If the graft plan could change after examining you, clarify when that decision would be made and how consent and the written quote would be updated. Avoid treating a preliminary message as a final surgical plan.
Plan for two areas of recovery
If rib harvest is proposed, ask about the donor-site incision, discomfort, scar, activity restrictions and review arrangements alongside nasal care. The treating team should explain relevant risks and the specific instructions for your case. Do not copy exercises or recovery deadlines from another patient's account.
Ask whom to contact for concerns affecting either area and when an in-person assessment is needed. If you will travel, explain your journey and work demands so the team can discuss an individual plan. A hotel's booked nights do not determine medical readiness to fly or return to activity.
Put the unresolved questions in writing
A useful summary identifies the problem being addressed, proposed access, graft source, alternatives, uncertainties and follow-up. It should also distinguish clinical decisions from accommodation or transfer arrangements. No price quoted in Rhinoplasty Team Turkey's general guide represents Göde's fees or a revision quotation.
For broader background, read the revision rhinoplasty guide. Keep this more focused question list beside it: Why is extra cartilage needed? What alternatives remain? What happens at the donor site? What records will I receive? Who assesses a later concern after I return home?
Sources and further reading
Checked 13 October 2026: Göde and Berber, Closed Approach Rib Revision Rhinoplasty, PMID 42580758, DOI 10.1055/a-2927-4470; Sercan Göde's official FAQ and surgery-planning pages; ASPS, Rhinoplasty Consultation, Risks and Safety and Recovery. These sources support consultation preparation, not an individual recommendation or comparison of surgeons.
Rhinoplasty Team Turkey
